Latest revision as of 12:11, 5 April 2017

Abstract

Free flow speed (FFS) is defined in the HCM as the “average speed of vehicles on a given segment, measured under low-volume conditions, when drivers are free to travel at their desired speed and are not constrained by the presence of other vehicles or downstream traffic control devices”. FFS is a very important parameter for the estimation of LOS and capacity for uninterrupted highways facilities. Ideally, FFS is determined using field measurements, but the HCM 2010 provides models for its estimation, when field data is not available. Such models must be recalibrated for local conditions when the HCM 2010 is adapted for use in countries outside North America. In this paper, Multivariate Analysis (MVA) techniques are used to investigate which infrastructure characteristics are related to FFS on Brazilian expressway facility segments, in order to provide a framework for the development of models to replace those used in HCM 2010 to estimate FFS. This study used a database with a large number of speed-flow observations obtained at 36 sites on Brazilian expressways (freeways and divided multilane highways), along with information on seven variables describing segment characteristics such as: expressway type; roadside environment; number of lanes; rise and fall; bendiness; access point density; and posted speed limit for passenger cars. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to select the variables to be included in the proposed model. The results of the PCA indicated that three components are responsible for most of the variance on observed FFS: (1) posted speed; (2) the combined effects of road class, number of lanes and density of access points; and (3) the interaction of geometric design and roadside environment. Stepwise linear regression was used to fit a FFS model from these three components. This model was mathematically manipulated to provide a FFS that is structurally similar to the one used by HCM 2010 but in fact accounts for the interactions among variables. The proposed model can replace the HCM 2010 model and does not require the user to choose an initial value for the base FFS.

Keywords

Free flow speed ; HCM ; freeways ; multilane highways ; multivariate analysis

References

1. Andrade and Setti, 2011 Andrade, G.R., and Setti, J.R. (2011) Método para Caracterização e Classificação de Trechos Homogêneos Rodoviários. In Anais do 7 Congresso Brasileiro de Rodovias e Concessões – CBR&C 2011, Foz do Iguaçu, PR (CD-ROM), 14 p.
2. Andrade and Setti, 2014 G.R. Andrade, J.R. Setti; Speed-Flow Relationship and Capacity for Expressways in Brazil; In TRB 93rd Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers, TRB, Washington D.C. (2014), pp. 1–18
3. Cafiso and Cerni, 2012 S. Cafiso, G. Cerni; New approach to defining continuous speed profile models for two-lane rural roads; Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2309 (2012), pp. 157–167
4. Chesher and Harrison, 1987 Chesher, A., and Harrison, R. (1987) The Highway Design and Maintenance Standards Model. Volume 1, Vehicle Operating Costs: Evidence from Developing Countries. Transportation Department, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
5. Deardoff et al., 2011 M.D. Deardoff, B.N. Wiesner, J. Fazio; Estimating Free-Flow Speed from Posted Speed Limit Signs; In 6th International Symposium on Highway Capacity and Quality of Service, Stockholm Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences Elsevier, 16 (2011), pp. 306–316
6. De Luca et al., 2012 M. De Luca, R. Lamberti, G. Dell’Acqua; Freeway Free Flow Speed: A Case Study in Italy. In 15th meeting of the EURO Working; Group on Transportation. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences Elsevier, 54 (2012), pp. 628–636
7. Greenwood and Bennet, 1996 Greenwood, I.D., and Bennet, C.R. (1996) The Effects of Traffic Congestion and Fuel Consumption. Road & Transport Research, Journal of Australian and New Zealand Research and Practice , ARRB Transport Research, Vol. 5, n. 2, South Victoria, Australia.
8. Jolliffe, 2002 Jolliffe, I.T. (2002) Principal Component Analysis. Second Edition . Department of Mathematical Sciences, Kings College, University of Aberdeen, UK.
9. Luttinen et al., 2005 Luttinen, R.T., Dixon, M., and Washburn, S. (2005) Two-Lane Highway Analysis in HCM 2000. In 84th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, 17 pp.
10. Odoki and Kerali, 2006 Odoki, J.B., and Kerali, H.G. R. (2006) The Highway Development and Management Series: Volume Four – Analytical Framework and Model Descriptions. The World Road Association (PIARC), Paris, France.
11. Roess, 2009 Roess, R. (2009) Re-Calibration of the 75-mi/h Speed-Flow Curve and the FFS Prediction Algorithm for HCM 2010. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, 17 p.
12. Roess et al., 2010 Roess, R., Prassas, E.S., and McShane, W.R. (2010) Traffic Engineering 4^thed . Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
13. TRB, 2000 TRB (2000) Highway Capacity Manual 2000. Transportation Research Board, The National Academies, Washington, D.C.
14. TRB, 2010 TRB (2010) Highway Capacity Manual 2010. Transportation Research Board, The National Academies, Washington, D.C.
15. Tseng et al., 2005 P.W. Tseng, F.B. Lin, S.L. Shieh; Estimation of free-flow speeds for multilane rural and suburban highways; Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 6 (2005), pp. 1484–1495
16. Watanatada et al., 1987 Watanatada, T., Dhareshwar, A., and Rezende-Lima, P.R. S. (1987) The Highway Design and Maintenance Standard Model Volume II, Vehicle Speeds and Operating Costs: Models for Road Planning and Management. World Bank, Transportation Department, Washington, D.C.
17. Ye et al., 2011 Ye, Q., Tarko, A.P., and Sinha, K.C. (2011) A free-flow speed model for Indiana arterial roads. In 80^thAnnual Transportation Research Board Meeting , Washington, D.C.
18. Zuriaga et al., 2010 A.M.P. Zuriaga, A.G. García, F.J.C. Torregrosa, P. D’Attoma; Modeling operating speed and deceleration on two-lane rural roads with global positioning system data; Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2171 (2010), pp. 11–20