Latest revision as of 12:11, 5 April 2017

Abstract

Traffic congestion in urban areas is a big issue for cities around the world. Thus, studying congestion and respective counter measures is of high importance for the increasing urbanization of society. Congestion analysis and forecast is most of the times done either on a link-wise network or on a network-wide level. Though, due to bottlenecks in the infrastructure and similar commuting patterns by road users, usually the same parts of an urban traffic network get congested. The idea is to observe and investigate primarily these most vulnerable parts of the network, which are denoted as congestion clusters, as they are crucial to both, drivers and operators. A methodology for determining congestion clusters is described, which provides a significant amount of flexibility to be able to meet different needs for different applications or cities. Based on a five months set of Floating Car (FC) data, the suggested methodology is tested. First analyses are conducted to understand up to which degree these clusters are able to represent the congestion level of the entire network. Besides, correlations between the clusters are investigated on a statistical basis and conclusions are drawn. The results provide a basis for potential traffic estimation and forecast systems.

Keywords

probe data ; network clustering ; congestion analysis ; traffic estimation ; traffic prediction

References

1. Cheng et al., 2012 T. Cheng, J. Haworth, J. Wang; Spatio-temporal autocorrelation of road network data; Journal of Geographical Systems, 14 (4) (2012), pp. 389–413
2. Corrado de Fabritiis, 2008 R.R. Corrado de Fabritiis; Traffic Estimation and Prediction Based on Real Time Floating Car Data; Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 11 (2008), pp. 197–203
3. Gao et al., 2011 Gao, Y., Sun, S., & Shi, D. (2011). Network-Scale Traffic Modeling and Forecasting with Graphical Lasso. In D. Hutchison, T. Kanade, J. Kittler, J.M. Kleinberg, F. Mattern, J.C. Mitchell, . . . H. He, Advances in Neural Networks – ISNN 2011 (Vol. 6676, pp. 151-158). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
4. Haworth and Cheng, 2014 J. Haworth, T. Cheng; A Comparison of Neighbourhood Selection Techniques in Spatio-Temporal Forecasting Models; ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2 (2014), pp. 7–12
5. Herring et al., 2010 R. Herring, P. Abbeel, A. Hofleitner, A. Bayen; Estimating arterial traffic conditions using sparse probe data; IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 13 (2010), pp. 929–936
6. Ji and Geroliminis, 2012 Y. Ji, N. Geroliminis; On the spatial partitioning of urban transportation networks; Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 46 (10) (2012), pp. 1639–1656
7. Ji et al., 2014 Y. Ji, J. Luo, N. Geroliminis; Empirical Observations of Congestion Propagation and Dynamic Partitioning with Probe Data for Large-Scale Systems; Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2422 (2014), pp. 1–11
8. Kamarianakis and Prastacos, 2005 Y. Kamarianakis, P. Prastacos; Space–time modeling of traffic flow; Computers & Geosciences, 31 (2) (2005), pp. 119–133
9. Karlaftis and Vlahogianni, 2011 M. Karlaftis, E. Vlahogianni; Statistical methods versus neural networks in transportation research: Differences, similarities and some insights; Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 19 (3) (2011), pp. 387–399
10. Lippi et al., 2013 M. Lippi, M. Bertini, P. Frasconi; Short-Term Traffic Flow Forecasting: An Experimental Comparison of Time-Series Analysis and Supervised Learning; IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 14 (2) (2013), pp. 871–882
11. Min and Wynter, 2011 W. Min, L. Wynter; Real-time road traffic prediction with spatio-temporal correlations; Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 19 (4) (2011), pp. 606–616
12. Quddus et al., 2007 M.A. Quddus, W.Y. Ochieng, R.B. Noland; Current map-matching algorithms for transport applications: State-of-the art and future research directions; Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 15 (5) (2007), pp. 312–328
13. Saeedmanesh and Geroliminis, 2015 M. Saeedmanesh, N. Geroliminis; Clustering of heterogeneous networks with directional flows based on “snake” similarities; 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (2015)
14. Vlahogianni et al., 2014 E.I. Vlahogianni, M.G. Karlaftis, J.C. Golias; Short-term traffic forecasting: Where we are and where we’re going; Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 43 (2014), pp. 3–19
15. Yue and Yeh, 2008 Y. Yue, A.G.-O. Yeh; Spatiotemporal traffic-flow dependency and short-term traffic forecasting; Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35 (5) (2008), pp. 762–771