Latest revision as of 12:12, 5 April 2017

Abstract

Unlike the U.S. 2010 Highway Capacity Manual, the most recent edition of German Highway Capacity Manual does not include methodology to evaluate the facility within oversaturated time periods. To incorporate this traffic flow regime within the methodology, we identify several aspects of the methodology that require enhancements and propose modifications. Next, we implement these modifications in a macroscopic traffic model developed as a software implementation of the German guideline. In this manner, the HBS user can conduct traffic flow analysis that includes volume-to-capacity ratios above 1.00 which has not been foreseen by the guideline until now. The main contribution of this paper is the identification of methods within the German Highway Capacity Manual that require modification to enable incorporation of oversaturated traffic flow within the analysis. Further, we introduce traffic density as a variable within the HBS methodology and show benefits of its incorporation during the oversaturated time periods. Finally, the paper includes illustrative examples of empirical and model-based evaluation of congested freeway facility in Germany. The paper concludes with a discussion of proposed methods and their limitations.

Keywords

freeway facility ; oversaturation ; HCM ; HBS ; macroscopic traffic flow model

References

1. Brilon et al., 1994 Brilon et al. (1994). Procedure for Calculating the Efficiency and Quality of the Flow of Traffic on Roads. Bonn: Schriftenreihe Forschung Straßenbau und Straßenverkehrstechnik [Series: Research in road construction and road-traffic technique]; No. 669.
2. Brilon, 2000 Brilon, W. (2000). Traffic Flow Analysis Beyond Traditional Methods. 4th International Symposium on Highway Capacity . TRB Circular EC018.
3. Brilon and Geistefeldt, 2010 Brilon, W., & Geistefeldt, J. (2010). Überprüfung der Bemessungswerte des HBS für Autobahnabschnitte außerhalb der Knotenpunkte. Schriftenreihe Forschung Straßenbau und Straßenverkehrstechnik [Research in road construction and road-traffic technique]; No. 1033.
4. Brilon and Lemke, 2000 Brilon, W., & Lemke, K. (2000). Road Cross-Sections in Tunnels. Bonn: Schriftenreihe Forschung Straßenbau und Straßenverkehrstechnik [Series: Research in road construction and road-traffic technique]; No. 785.
5. Brilon and Ponzlet, 1995 W. Brilon, M. Ponzlet; Application of traffic flow models; Proceedings of the Workshop in Traffic and Granular Flow (1995)
6. Brilon and Ponzlet, 1996 Brilon, W., & Ponzlet, M. (1996). Effects of Time-dependent Capacities . Bonn: Schriftenreihe Forschung Straßenbau und Straßenverkehrstechnik [Series: Research in road construction and road-traffic technique]; No. 718.
7. Brilon and Westphal, 1994 Brilon, W., & Westphal, S. (1994). Assesment of Slip Roads at Multi-level Junctions. Bonn: Schriftenreihe Forschung Straßenbau und Straßenverkehrstechnik [Series: Research in road construction and road-traffic technique]; No. 671.
8. Brilon and Zurlinden, 2003 Brilon, W., & Zurlinden, H. (2003). Overload probabilities and traffic activity as design criteria for road traffic systems. Bonn: Schriftenreihe Forschung Straßenbau und Straßenverkehrstechnik [Series: Research in road construction and road-traffic technique]; No. 870.
9. Cameron, 1996 Cameron, R. (1996). An Expanded LOS Gradation System. ITE Journal . Washington D.C.: ITE.
10. Daganzo, 1994 Daganzo, C.F. (1994). The Cell Transmission Model: A Dynamic Representation of Highway Traffic Consistent with the Hydrodynamic Theory. Transportation Research, part B Vol 28B, No.4 .
11. FGSV, 2001 FGSV. (2001). Handbuch fuer Bemessung von Straßenverkehrsanlagen: HBS (German Highway Capacity Manual). Cologne.
12. FGSV, 2008a FGSV. (2008). Richtlinien für die Anlage von Autobahnen: RAA (Guideline for the freeway facilities design). Cologne: Forschunggesellschaft fuer Strassen- und Verkehrswesen.
13. FGSV, 2008b FGSV. (2008). Richtlinien für integrierte Netzgestaltung: RIN (Guideline for integrated network design). Cologne: Forschungsgesellschaft fuer Strassen- und Verkehrswesen.
14. FGSV, 2015 FGSV. (2015). Handbuch für die Bemessung von Straßenverkehrsanlagen: HBS (German Highway Capacity Manual). Cologne: Forschungsgesellschaft fuer Strassen- und Verkehrswesen.
15. Friedrich et al., 2008 Friedrich, B., Hoffmann, S., Irzik, M., & Matschke, I. (2008). Two-lane on-ramps on thr three-lane freeways. Bonn: Schriftenreihe Forschung Straßenbau und Straßenverkehrstechnik [Series: Research in road construction and road-traffic technique]; No. 992.
16. Friedrich et al., 2006 Friedrich, B., Irzik, M., & Hoffmann, S. (2006). Traffic quality of diverge segment type A2. Bonn: Schriftenreihe Forschung Straßenbau und Straßenverkehrstechnik [Series: Research in road construction and road-traffic technique]; No. 946.
17. Geistefeldt and Zurlinden, 2004 Geistefeldt, J., & Zurlinden, H. (2004). Whole-Year-Analysis of Motorway Traffic Flow. Straßenverkehrstechnik 48/11 . Köln: Forschungsgesellschaft für Straßen- und Verkehrswesen.
18. Geistefeldt et al., 2015 Geistefeldt, J., Giuliani, S., Vortisch, P., Leyn, U., Trapp, R., Busch, F., . . . Celikkaya, N. (2015, (submitted)). HBS-konforme Simulation (Assessment of Level of Service On Freeways by Microscopic Traffic Simulation). (Presented at the Transportation Research Board 93nd Annual Meeting) . Bergisch Gladbach: The Federal Highway Research Institute.
19. Hartmann et al., 2015 Hartmann, M., Vortisch, P., & Schroeder, B. (2015). A German Approach to Freeway Facility Evaluation. Washington D.C.: Transportation Research Board of the National Academics.
20. Hartmann et al., 2016 Hartmann, M., Vortisch, P., Vieten, M., Chatzipanagiotidou, Y., Haug, A., & Spangler, M. (2016). Wechselwirkungen zwischen Streckenabschnitten und Knotenpunkten bei der Ermittlung von Fahrtgeschwindigkeiten. Berichte der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (in press) . Bergisch Gladbach.
21. Kittelson, 2000 Kittelson, W.K. (2000). Highway Capacity and Quality of Service. Transporation in the New Millenium. A3A10: Committee on Highway Capacity and Quality of Service.
22. Roess et al., 2010 Roess, R., Vandehey, M.A., & Kittelson, W. (2010). Level of Sevice, 2010 and Beyond. Transporation Research Record: Journal of the TRB, No.2173, pp. 20-27. Washington D.C.: Transportation Research Board of the National Academics.
23. Schnüll et al., 2000 Schnüll, R., Hoffmann, S., & Irzik, M. (2000). Freeway diverges. Project Report FE 02.195/1999/ARB. Hannover: former Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Development.
24. Transportation Research Board, 2010 Transportation Research Board. (2010). Highway Capacity Manual. Washington, D.C.: TRB.
25. van Aerde, 1995 van Aerde, M. (1995). A Single Regime Speed Flow-Density Relationship for Freeways adn Arterials. Proceedings of 74th TRB Annual Meeting . Washington D.C.
26. Weiser and Sillus, 2006 Weiser, F., & Sillus, A. (2006). Traffic quality of diverge segments with lane reduction on major freeway. Bonn: Schriftenreihe Forschung Straßenbau und Straßenverkehrstechnik [Series: Research in road construction and road-traffic technique]; No. 936.
27. Wirth and Staufer, 2000 Wirth, M., & Staufer, M. (2000). Draft of Project Report FE 02.194/1999/ARB. Munich: former Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Development.
28. Wu and Lemke, 2011 Wu, N., & Lemke, K. (2011). A new Model for Level of Service of Freeway Merge, Diverge, and Weaving Segments. 6th International Symposium on Highway Capacity and Quality of Service . Stockholm: Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 16, 151-161, Elsevier.