Latest revision as of 12:12, 5 April 2017

Abstract

Freeway work zones typically mandate lane closures that often induce bottlenecks. Merge maneuvers and the accompanying increase in the rate of lane changes at these bottlenecks can become problematic resulting in undesirable mobility and safety impacts. Traditionally, merge control strategies are deployed to mitigate such impacts. Literature sources indicate that available merge control strategies fall into one of four categories, namely: (i) early merge control, (ii) late merge control, (iii) temporary ramp metering, and (iv) mainline merge metering. However, little is known about the proper criteria for selecting and implementing one of the available merge control strategies. In addition, the impact of the various control strategies on freeway Level of Service (LOS) is currently under-researched. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the operational impacts of the above-mentioned freeway merge control strategies. The goal is to provide work-zone-aware LOS indicators that would help transportation agencies in selecting the most appropriate merge control strategy to minimally impact the freeway operations. In order to meet the research goals and objectives, this study used the CORSIM micro-simulation platform to evaluate impacts of various merge control strategies at a freeway study corridor in Birmingham, AL. The 2010 Highway Capacity Manual methods for calculating LOS were considered and modifications were proposed to align the calculated LOS with the assessed impacts of each merge control strategy. This study is significant for its contribution to providing transportation researchers and professionals with tools and methods to evaluate freeway LOS under work zone conditions and assisting them in mitigating the adverse impacts of work zones on traffic operations.

Keywords

Traffic Flow ; Traffic Congestion ; Bottlenecks ; Level of Service ; Simulation

References

1. Dowling et al., 2004 Dowling, R., Skabardonis, A., and Alexiadis, V. (2004). “Traffic Analysis Toolbox Volume III: Guidelines for Applying Traffic Microsimulation Software.” Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
2. Federal Highway Administration, 2011 Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2011). “HPMS Field Manual - Appendix N: Procedures for Estimating Highway Capacity.” <http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/hpmsmanl/appn.cfm> (June 22, 2015).
3. Anon, 2012 ---. (2012). Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) , 2009 ed., FHWA, Washington, DC.
4. Hardy and Wunderlich, 2009 Hardy, M., and Wunderlich, K.E. (2009). “Traffic Analysis Tools Volume IX: Work Zone Modeling and Simulation - A Guide for Analysts.” Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
5. Holm et al., 2007 Holm, P., Tomich, D., Sloboden, J., and Lowrance, C. (2007). “Traffic Analysis Toolbox Volume IV: Guidelines for Applying CORSIM Microsimulation Modeling Software.” Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
6. Ramadan and Sisiopiku, 2015 O.E. Ramadan, V.P. Sisiopiku; Bottleneck Merge Control Strategies for Work Zones: Available Options and Current Practices; Open J. Civ. Eng., 5 (4) (2015), pp. 428–436
7. Shoaib, 2002 Shoaib, L. (2002). Calibration of FRESIM for Work Zones Using Field Observable Parameters . Master of Science Thesis, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH <http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1022862132>.
8. Transportation Research Board, 2010 Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2010). Highway Capacity Manual 2010 , TRB, Washington, DC.
9. Vadakpat et al., 1999 G. Vadakpat, S. Stoffels, K. Dixon; Calibration and Validation of CORSIM for Work Zones; ITE J., 69 (2) (1999), pp. 12–14
10. Wei et al., 2010 H. Wei, M. Pavithran, P. Yi, Q. Yang, Q.-A. Zeng; Synthesis of Unconventional Dynamic Merge Metering Traffic Control for Work Zones; Open Transp. J., 4 (2010), pp. 52–60
11. Wei et al., 2008 Wei, H., Pavithran, M., Yi, P., and Yang, Q.K. (2008). “Simulation Trials on Unconventional Alternative to Congestion Mitigation and Traffic Control at Highway Work-Zone Bottlenecks Using Advanced Technologies.” Transportation Research Board 87^thAnnual Meeting , Washington, DC.
12. Zegeer et al., 2008 Zegeer, J.D., Vandehey, M., Blogg, M., Nguyen, K., and Ereti, M. (2008). “Default Values for Highway Capacity and Level of Service Analyses.” NCHRP Report , Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
13. Zhang et al., 2012 Zhang, L., Morallos, D., Jeannotte, K., and Strasser, J. (2012). “Traffic Analysis Toolbox Volume XII: Work Zone Traffic Analysis – Applications and Decision Framework.” Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.