Latest revision as of 12:12, 5 April 2017

Abstract

The growth of vehicle sales and use world-wide requires the consumption of significant quantities of energy and materials. Advanced propulsion systems and electric drive vehicles have substantially different characteristics and impacts. For a comprehensive comparison of advanced and traditional light duty vehicles, a model is developed that integrates external costs, including emissions and time losses, with societal and consumer life cycle costs. Life cycle emissions and time losses are converted into costs for seven urban light duty vehicles. The results, which are based on vehicle technology characteristics and transportation impacts on environment, facilitate vehicle comparisons and support policy making in transportation. More sustainable urban transportation can be achieved in the short term by promoting policies that increase vehicle occupancy. In the intermediate term, more sustainable urban transportation can be achieved by increasing the share of hybrid vehicles in traffic. In the long term, more sustainable urban transportation can be achieved with the widespread use of electric vehicles. A sensitivity analysis of life cost results revealed that vehicle costs change significantly for different geographical areas depending on vehicle taxation, and the pricing of gasoline, electric power and pollution. Current practices in carbon and air quality pricing favor oil and coal based technologies. However, increasing the cost of electricity from coal and other fossil fuels would increase the variable cost for electric vehicles, and would favor the variable cost of hybrid vehicles.

Keywords

traffic composition ; vehicle emissions ; life cycle cost ; alternative fuels ; societal cost

References

1. AAA, 2011 AAA – American Automobile Association (2011). Your Driving Fixed Costs.
2. Delft, 2008 CE Delft (2008). Handbook on estimation of external costs in the transportation sector. http://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/sustainable (Accessed in January 2015).
3. CTR, 2008 CTR – Center for Transportation Research (1998). Total energy cycle assessment of electric and conventional vehicles: An energy and environmental analysis. Argonne National Laboratory.
4. CTR, 2006 CTR – Center for Transportation Research (2006). Development and Applications of GREET 2.7. The transportation vehicle-cycle model. Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory.
5. Davis et al., 2012 Davis S.C., Diegel S.W., Boundy R.G. (2012). Transportation Energy Data Book, Edition 31. U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
6. Delucchi et al., 2000 Delucchi M.A., Burke A., Lipman T., Miller M. (2000). Electric and gasoline vehicle lifecycle cost and energy-use model, report for the California air resources board, USD-ITS-RR-99-04.
7. Delucchi, 2003 Delucchi, M.A. (2003). A lifecycle emissions model: lifecycle emissions from transportation fuels, motor vehicles, transportation modes, electricity use, heating and cooking fuels, and materials. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California Davis.
8. DOE, 2015 DOE – U.S. Department of Energy (2015). <https://www.energy.gov> (Accessed in March 2015).
9. Duvall, 2002 Duvall M. (2002). Comparing the benefits and impacts of hybrid vehicle options for compact sedan and sport utility vehicles. EPRI.
10. Edmund, 2011 Edmund (2011). Top 10 best-selling vehicles. http://www.edmunds.com. (Accessed in May 2011).
11. EIA, 2012 EIA – U.S. Energy Information Administration (Accessed in March 2012).
12. EPA, 2003 EPA – U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2003. Users guide to MOBILE6.1 and MOBILE6.2.
13. EPA, 2012 EPA – U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2012). Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Transportation Sector Emissions. http://www.epa.gov/climatechange (Accessed in June 2013).
14. Extern, 2004 ExternE (2004). Externalities of energy: extension of accounting framework and policy applications. Final Technical report ENG1-CT2002-00609.
15. Gehm, 2012 R. Gehm; Heavy on the lightweighting; Automotive Engineering International., 120 (2012), p. 7
16. Goedecke et al., 2007 M. Goedecke, S. Therdthianwong, S.H. Gheewala; Life cycle cost analysis of alternative vehicles and fuels in Thailand; Energy Policy, 35 (2007), pp. 3236–3246
17. Graham Scott and William, 2010 J. Graham, B.S. Scott, L.M. William; Corporate Finance: Linking Theory to What Companies Do; (Third Edition)South Western Cengage Learning (2010)
18. Hendrickson et al., 2006 Hendrickson C.T., Lave L.B., Matthews S.H. (2006). Environmental life cycle assessment of goods and services, an input-output approach.
19. Lawrence and Kornfield, 1998 M.F. Lawrence, T. Kornfield; Transportation subsidies, economic efficiency, equity, and public policy; Nonrenewable Resources, 7 (2) (1998), pp. 137–142
20. Lane, 2006 Lane B., (2006). Life cycle assessment of vehicle fuels and technologies. Ecolane Transport Consultancy.
21. Muller et al., 2011 N.Z. Muller, R. Mendelsohn, W. Nordhaus; Environmental accounting for pollution in the United States; American Economic Review, 101 (2011), p. 5
22. Nissan, 2014 Nissan (2014). <http://www.nissanusa.com/electric-cars/leaf/>. (Accessed in February 2015).
23. Ogden et al., 2004 J.M. Ogden, R.H. Williams, E.D. Larson; Societal costs of cars with alternative fuels/engines; Energy Policy, 32 (2004), pp. 7–27
24. Paula, 2013 Paula, M. (2013). Diesel boom? Ownership of diesel cars way up, but still a fraction of U.S. market. Forbes. http://goo.gl/F1Zztj. Accessed February 20, 2016.
25. Tol, 2005 R.S.J. Tol; The marginal damage costs of carbon dioxide emissions: An assessment of the uncertainties; Energy Policy, 33 (16) (2005), pp. 2064–2074
26. Toyota, 2014 Toyota (2014). <http://www.toyota.com>. (Accessed in February 2014).
27. TRB, 2014 TRB - Transportation Research Board (2010). Commuting in America III. TCRP Report 110. National Cooperative Highway Research Program.
28. TTI, 2009 TTI (2009). Urban mobility report. <http://tti.tamu.edu/>. (Accessed in April 2010).
29. Wikipedia, 2015 Wikipedia (2015). Volkswagen emissions violations. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_emissions_testing_scandal> (Accessed in Sept. 2015).