Latest revision as of 12:12, 5 April 2017

Abstract

Freeway networks are a critical component of the transportation systems at large metropolitan areas. The use of managed lanes (MLs) is a very important tool in accommodating directional demand, often heavily asymmetrical at peak hours. Current literature establishes that operational performance of MLs may impact, and be impacted by, operations of adjacent general purpose lanes (GPs), despite some degree of physical separation. Such operational co-dependence may especially exist between the GP lane adjacent to the separation buffer and the ML lane. This paper examines how the operations of these lanes relate to each other. Operational data were collected from 2 freeway sites in Houston TX (U.S.A.) for analysis. Both sites feature a buffer separating a single ML from the GP lanes at each site. One of those sites features vertical pylons in its buffer while the other site does not. This dataset spans several months of year 2014, from January to December. Results highlight the influence of the left-most GP lane on the ML operational speed, as well as the apparent degree of mitigation to that influence that the presence of pylons provides.

Keywords

Managed Lanes ; Freeway Operations ; Pylons ; Buffers with Pylons ; Managed Lanes Operations ; HOV Lanes

References

1. Carson, 2005 J.L. Carson; Monitoring and Evaluating Managed Lane Facility Performance; Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, TX (2005)
2. Dixon et al., 2015 K. Dixon, K. Fitzpatrick, R. Avelar; Reducing Lane and Shoulder Width to Permit an Additional Lane on a Freeway: Technical Report; Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, TX (2015)
3. Fox and Weisberg, 2011 Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2011). An {R} Companion to Applied Regression, Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Retrieved from http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion.
4. Kwon and Varaiya, 2008 J. Kwon, P. Varaiya; Effectiveness of Californias High Occupancy Vehicle System; Transportation Research Part C (2008), pp. 98–115
5. Martin et al., 2004 P. Martin, J. Perrin, P. Wu, R. Lambert; Evaluation of the Effectiveness of High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes; Utah Department of Transportation, Research Division, Salt Lake City, UT (2004)
6. Nee et al., 1999 J. Nee, J. Ishimaru, M. Hallenbeck; Evaluation Tools for HOV Lane Performance Monitoring; Washington State Transportation Center, Olympia, WA (1999)
7. Pinheiro and Bates, 2000 J. Pinheiro, D.M. Bates; Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS; Springer, New York (2000)
8. Roess et al., 2004 R. Roess, E. Prassas, W. McShane; Traffic Engineering (Third Edition)Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ (2004)
9. The and Development Core Team, 2013 The R Development Core Team. (2013). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) Retrieved April 2013, from http://www.R-project.org.
10. Transportation Research Board, 2010 Transportation Research Board. (2010). Highway Capacity Manual 2010. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
11. Venables and Ripley, 2002 W.N. Venables, B.D. Ripley; Modern Applied Statistics with S. Fourth EditionSpringer, New York (2002)
12. Wang et al., 2012 Y. Wang, X. Liu, N. Rouphail, B. Schroeder, Y. Yin, L. Bloomberg; Analysis of Managed Lanes on Freeway Facilities; Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC (2012)