Latest revision as of 12:13, 5 April 2017

Abstract

This paper presents an investigation of capacity reduction in connection with roadwork. The paper presents a state-of-the-art description on roadwork effects on capacity. The state-of-the art has been used to develop a model for estimation of capacity reduction at roadwork zone on Swedish roads. The model has partly been validated with empirical data from a full scale test at the freeway network in Gothenburg. The studies presented in the literature shows that capacity differs not only between different roadwork designs but also between roadwork with similar design. Thus, one can conclude that there is a high variation between the roadwork zone due to effects of surrounding elements, such as the type of work and external effects such as rain (which affects the capacity even under normal conditions). The differences that exist in the estimation of capacity for motorway sections next to a roadwork zone can be said to consist of four situation-specific variables. These four variables are: the percentage of heavy vehicles, type of road, the width of the remaining lanes and diversion of traffic to the opposite carriageway. An increasing proportion of heavy vehicles have a negative impact on roadwork zone capacity. An increasing complexity of work, from light barrier works to extensive bridge repair, has a negative impact on performance. An increased lane width has a positive effect on capacity. The diversion of traffic to the opposite carriageway is often the cause of the bottleneck and therefore has a significance effect on capacity. The conclusion from the literature review is that the most important parameters that should be incorporated in a Swedish capacity manual for the operation and maintenance of roadwork are: the proportion of heavy traffic, lane width, type of roadwork, number of closed lanes, closed road shoulder, proportion of commuter traffic and length of roadwork zone. In general, there have been (too) few empirical studies focusing on the differences in capacity caused by these situation-specific variables. The paper presents a comparison between the Dutch model for computation of capacity reduction and a composite model of reduction factors from Germany, USA and Denmark. The comparison show that the two models essentially gives the same results. Based on these results a new model was developed. In the developed model, the capacity for the remaining lane is calculated. The paper presents results from a field study in Gothenburg where throughput was measured in three cases during a morning hour and one afternoon hour. The capacity was calculated from the normal site conditions according to historical traffic flow and speed data. The result shows that the empirically estimated confidence interval of capacity reduction is consistent with the reduction calculated with the new model for the different cases. The conclusion is that the model can be used to calculate capacity reductions for different roadwork zone configurations but that validation for more configurations is desirable.

Keywords

roadwork ; motorway ; capacity

References

1. Al-Kaisy and Hall, 2003 A. Al-Kaisy, F. Hall; Guidelines for Estimating Capacity at Freeway Reconstruction Zones; Journal of Transportation Engineering, 129 (5) (2003), pp. 572–577
2. BASt, 2011 BASt (2011), Ausführungshinweise zum Leitfaden zum Arbeitsstellenmanagement auf Bundesautobahnen”. Bundesanstalt für Straβenwesen. Version Maj 2011.
3. Benekohal et al., 2010 Benekohal, R.F., Ramezani, H. and Avrenli K. A. (2010). Queue and Users Cost in Highway Work Zones. University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Research Report ICT-10-075, A report of the findings of ICT-R27-33 Queue and Users’ Costs in Highway Work Zones, Illinois Center for Transportation.
4. Benekohal, 2003 Benekohal R. F., Kaja-Mohideen, A., and M. V. Chitturi (2003), Evaluation of Construction Work Zone Operational Issues: Capacity, Queue, and Delay. ITRC FR 00/01-4, Illinois Transportation Research Center, Champaign, IL.
5. BMV, 1996 BMV (1996). Richtlinien zur Baubetriebsplanung auf Bundesautobahnen, Ausgabe 1996 (RBAP 96). Bundesminiterium für Verkehr. Bonn 1996.
6. Chitturi, 2005 M.V. Chitturi, R.F. Benekohal; Effect of Lane Width on Speed of Cars and Heavy Vehicles in Work Zones; Transportation Research Record, no, 1920 (2005), pp. 41–48
7. CROW, 2012 CROW (2012), Richtlijn voor werk in uitvoering op autosnelwegen, CROW 96a.
8. Department for Transportation, 2006 Department for Transportation UK (2006), QUADRO4 User Manual currently DMRB volume 14.
9. Godley and Triggs, 2004 S.T. Godley, T.J. Triggs, B.N. Fildes; Perceptual lane width, wide perceptual road center markings and driving speeds, Ergonomics, 47 (3) (2004), pp. 237–256
10. Gunay, 2007 B. Gunay; Car following theory with lateral discomfort; Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 41 (7) (2007), pp. 722–735
11. Heaslip et al., 2008 Heaslip, K., Louisell, C. and Collura, J. (2008). Driver Population Adjustment Factors for Highway Capacity Manuals Work Zone Capacity Equation. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
12. Hogema, 2005 Hogema, J.H. (2005), Wijzer op Weg rijsimulatorstudie, Soesterberg: TNO Technische Menskunde.
13. Hogema and Brouwer, 1999 Hogema, J.A. and Brouwer, R.F.T. (1999), Inschatting van gedragseffecten van dynamische rijbaanindelingen, Soesterberg: TNO Technische Menskunde.
14. Karim and Adeli, 2003 A. Karim, H. Adeli; Radial basis function neural network for work zone capacity and queue estimation; Journal of Transportation Engineering, 129 (5) (2003), pp. 494–503
15. Kuile, 2006 Kuile, R.J. (2006), Rijgedrag en verkeerafwikkeling bij werk in uitvoering met versmalde rijstroken.
16. Lindly, 2004 Lindly, J.L., and P. R. Clark (2004), University Transportation Center for Alabama (UTCA) Report Number 04406 – Characterizing Work Zone Configurations and Effects. UTCA, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.
17. Maze and Bortle, 2005 Maze, T., & Bortle, M. (2005), Optimizing Work Zone Road Closure Capacity. Ames, Iowa, United Stated of America: Center For Transportation Research And Education Iowa State University.
18. Rijkswaterstaat, 2011 Rijkswaterstaat (2011), Capaciteitswaarden, Infrastructuur Autosnelwegen Handboek (CIA), versie 3, Ministerie van infrastructuur en millieu, Datum 18 april 2011.
19. Strömgren and Per, 2015 Strömgren, Per (2015), Calibration and Validation of a Swedish Space-time Analytical Model, Transportation Research Procedia Volume 6, 2015, Pages 158-171, 4th International Symposium of Transport Simulation (ISTS’14) Selected Proceedings, Ajaccio, France, 1-4 June 2014.
20. Trafikverket, 2015 Trafikverket (2015), Effektsamband för vägtransportsystemet, Bygga om eller bygga nytt. Version 2015-04-01. Borlänge, Sweden.
21. Trafikverket, 2014 Trafikverket (2014), Kapitel 2 Motorvägar, i TRVMB Kapacitet och framkomlighetseffekter - Trafikverkets metodbeskrivning för beräkning av kapacitet och framkomlighetseffekter i vägtrafikanläggningar, TRV 2013:64343, Borlänge, Sweden.
22. Transportation Research Board, 2010 Transportation Research Board (2010), Highway Capacity Manual, 5th edition. edited by P. Ryus, M. Vandehey, L. Elefteriadou, R.G. Dowling, and B.K. Ostrom. Transport Research Board, Washington.
23. Ullman et al., 2009 Ullman, G.L, Porter, R.J. and Karkee, G.J. (2009). Monitoring Work Zone Safety and Mobility Impacts in Texas. Texas Transportation Institute, The Texas A&M University System.
24. Vejdirektoratet, 2010 Vejdirektoratet (2010), Vejregel, Trafikteknik, Kapacitet og Serviceniveau.
25. Weinspach, 1988 Weinspach, K. (1988). Verkehrssicherheit und Verkehrsablauf im Bereich von Baustellen auf Betriebsstrecken der Bundesautobahnen. Strasse und Autobahn, 257-265.