Latest revision as of 12:13, 5 April 2017

Abstract

The variable speed limit (VSL) system has been implemented on many freeways and urban arterials as a link control strategy. Objectives for deploying VSL systems may include giving advance warning, stabilize and smooth traffic (i.e. harmonization). Accuracy and reliability of the messages displayed by VSL systems can “make or break” its successful implementation. The aim of this paper was to present methods for evaluating VSL systems. As VSL systems may be implemented with different control strategies, an approach for assessing different features of the system independently was adopted. In this way, systems with different control strategies can be evaluated. Methods for assessing incident detection, warning and harmonization abilities were presented. A case study on the VSL system on the Autobahn A99 near Munich, Germany was also discussed.

Keywords

Variable Speed Limit System ; Incident Detection ; Warning ; Harmonization ; Consistency

References

1. Ackaah et al., 2015 W. Ackaah, G. Huber, K. Bogenberger; Quality Evaluation Method for Variable Speed Limit Systems: Incident Detection and Warning Potential; Transportation Research Record, 2484 (2015), pp. 80–89
2. Ackaah et al., 2016 Ackaah, W., Huber, G., Bogenberger, K., & Bertini, R.L. (2016). Assessing the Harmonization Potential of Variable Speed Limit Systems. Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting. Washington D.C.
3. Bel and Rosell, 2013 G. Bel, J. Rosell; Effects of the 80 km/h and Variable Speed Limits on Air Pollution; Transportation Research Part D, 23 (2013), pp. 90–97
4. Bogenberger, 2003 K. Bogenberger; The Quality of Traffic Information; BMW Group, Munich, Germany (2003)
5. Corthout et al., 2010 Corthout, R., Tampère, C.M., & Deknudt, P. (2010). Assessment of Variable Speed Limits from the Drivers’ Perspective. 2010 13th International IEEE Annual Conference on Intelligent Transport Systems (pp. 499-507). Madeira Islands, Portugal: IEEE.
6. Downey, 2015 Downey, B.M. (2015). Evaluating the Effects of a Congestion and Weather Responsive Advisory Variable Speed Limit System in Portland, Oregon. Master Thesis. Portland: Portland State University.
7. FHWA, 2009 FHWA. (2009). Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) for Streets and Highways. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).
8. Garcia-Castro and Monzon, 2014 A. Garcia-Castro, A. Monzon; Homogeneization Effects of Variable Speed Limits; Transport and Telecommunication, 15 (2) (2014), pp. 130–143
9. Hegyi et al., 2003 A. Hegyi, B. De Schutter, J. Hellendoorn; Optimal Coordination of Variable Speed Limits to Suppress Shock Waves; Transportation Research Record, 1852 (2003), pp. 167–174
10. Huber et al., 2014 Huber, G., Bogenberger, K., & Bertini, R.L. (2014). New Methods for Quality Assessment of Real-Time Traffic Information. Traansport Research Board 93rd. Annual Meeting. Washington, D.C.: Transport Research Board.
11. Kerner, 2009 Kerner, B.S. (2009). Introduction to Modern Traffic Flow Theory and Control: The long Road to Three-Phase Traffic Theory. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
12. Lee et al., 2004 C. Lee, B. Hellinga, F. Saccomanno; Assessing Safety Benefits of Variable Speed Limits; Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1897 (2004), pp. 183–190
13. Lucky, 2014 Lucky, A.B. (2014). The Impacts of Variable Speed Limit on Speed Variation and Headway Distribution, Masters Thesis. Queensland: Queensland University of Technology.
14. Mott MacDonald, 2008 Mott MacDonald. (2008). ATM Monitoring and Evaluation, 12 Month Report (Primary and Secondary Indicators), 203754_MM_007_V3, DOC/1807/V3 . Bristol: Highway Agency.
15. Nissan, 2010 Nissan, A. (2010). Evaluation of Variable Speed Limits: Empirical Evidence and Simulation Analysis of Stockholms Motorway Control System, PhD Thesis. Stockholm, Sweden: Royal institute of Technology.
16. Papageorgiou et al., 2008 M. Papageorgiou, E. Kosmatopoulos, I. Papamichail; Effects of Variable Speed Limits; Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2047 (2008), pp. 37–48
17. Piao and McDonald, 2008 Piao, J., & McDonald, M. (2008). Safety Impacts of Variable Speed Limits – A Simulation Study. Proceedings of the 11th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (pp. 833-837). Beijing, China: IEEE.
18. Steinhoff et al., 2001 Steinhoff, C., Kates, R., Keller, H., & Faerber, B. (2001). Problematik Praeventiver Schaltungen von Strackenbeeinflussungsanlagen. Bundesanstalt fuer Strassenwesen Forschunsvorhaben FE 03.321/1998/IRB.
19. Treiber and Helbing, 2002 Treiber, M., & Helbing, D. (2002). Reconstructing the Spatio-Temporal Traffic Dynamics from Stationary Detector Data. Cooper@tive Tr@nsport@tion Dyn@mics, 1 (3), 3.1-3.21.
20. Vukanovic, 2007 Vukanovic, S. (2007). Intelligent Link Control Framework with Empirical Objective Function: INCA, PhD Thesis. Munich.
21. Weikl et al., 2013 S. Weikl, K. Bogenberger, R.L. Bertini; Traffic Management Effects of Variable Speed Limit System on a German Autobahn: Empirical Assessment Before and After System Implementation; Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2380 (2013), pp. 48–60