(Created page with " == Abstract == Epic poetry has always been considered a masculine genre. The eruption of a group identity, masculine, white, aristocratic and christian, is the result of the...")
 
m (Clara moved page Draft Garcia 163677544 to 175a)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 16:56, 4 March 2019

Abstract

Epic poetry has always been considered a masculine genre. The eruption of a group identity, masculine, white, aristocratic and christian, is the result of the representation and the exclusion of the Other, fictitious and singular, but in fact composed of a variety of ethnic groups, origins, sex, genders, religions and different degrees between fiction and historicity. Indeed, in the historical epic poetry which narrated the Conquest, except for the conquistadors listed at length and the indigenous kings and caciques, only few characters are distinguished by a historical individualisation. The Other, Amerindian and female, makes a shy entrance into history, into singularity, into the (historical and christian) truth. It is the case of interpreters: Malinche and India Catalina, only historical native women that appear as part of the narrative plot as well as in the conquest enterprise in the poems of Lasso de la Vega (Cortés valeroso y Mexicana, Mexicana), of Juan de Castellanos (Elegías de varones ilustres de Indias) and of Saavedra Guzmán (El peregrino indiano).

Full document

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download <a href="https://test.scipedia.com/wd/images/9/96/Draft_Garcia_163677544-175-3429-document.pdf">Draft_Garcia_163677544-175-3429-document.pdf</a> directly to your device.
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2016

Volume 4, Issue 1, 2016
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

Keywords

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?