(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
S1319516613000340
 
 
 
In the above referenced paper, we obtained a new lacunary sequence <math display="inline">\theta ^{{'}}=(P_{k_r})</math> using a sequence of positive real numbers <math display="inline">(p_k)</math>. But we did not notice a lack of provision in the article. Throughout the paper, <math display="inline">H_r\rightarrow \infty </math> as <math display="inline">r\rightarrow \infty </math> should be assumed. The reason for adding such a provision is that the assumption “<math display="inline">P_n\rightarrow \infty </math> as <math display="inline">n\rightarrow \infty </math>” may not be enough to obtain the condition “<math display="inline">H_r\rightarrow \infty </math> as <math display="inline">r\rightarrow \infty </math>”.
 
In the above referenced paper, we obtained a new lacunary sequence <math display="inline">\theta ^{{'}}=(P_{k_r})</math> using a sequence of positive real numbers <math display="inline">(p_k)</math>. But we did not notice a lack of provision in the article. Throughout the paper, <math display="inline">H_r\rightarrow \infty </math> as <math display="inline">r\rightarrow \infty </math> should be assumed. The reason for adding such a provision is that the assumption “<math display="inline">P_n\rightarrow \infty </math> as <math display="inline">n\rightarrow \infty </math>” may not be enough to obtain the condition “<math display="inline">H_r\rightarrow \infty </math> as <math display="inline">r\rightarrow \infty </math>”.
  
 
Also, in the hypothesis of Theorem 6, the condition <math display="inline">I_r^{{'}}\subset I_r</math> should be added, whereas the condition <math display="inline">I_r\subset I_r^{{'}}</math> should be added in the hypothesis of Theorem 7 and Corollary 3.
 
Also, in the hypothesis of Theorem 6, the condition <math display="inline">I_r^{{'}}\subset I_r</math> should be added, whereas the condition <math display="inline">I_r\subset I_r^{{'}}</math> should be added in the hypothesis of Theorem 7 and Corollary 3.

Latest revision as of 15:39, 7 October 2016

In the above referenced paper, we obtained a new lacunary sequence using a sequence of positive real numbers . But we did not notice a lack of provision in the article. Throughout the paper, as should be assumed. The reason for adding such a provision is that the assumption “ as ” may not be enough to obtain the condition “ as ”.

Also, in the hypothesis of Theorem 6, the condition should be added, whereas the condition should be added in the hypothesis of Theorem 7 and Corollary 3.

Back to Top

Document information

Published on 07/10/16

Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?