Abstract

This article, embedded in the field of Philology —with an historical approach and a linguistic viewpoint— and in the history of the Spanish language, discusses the acceptability of the examples presented as copyist errors in two of the most renowned manuals in Spanish textual criticism, namely, Manual de crítica textual (1983, 2001) by Alberto Blecua, and La edición de textos (2011) by Miguel Ángel Pérez Priego (for Pérez Priego, see Arellano’s observations in his review, 1997). The analysis of the cases and their documentation from different sources —critical editions and metalinguistic works— enables the conclusion that several of the so-called errors in these manuals are in fact legitimate, historically-documented linguistic variations, although some of them being scarcely testified.

Full document

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download <a href="https://test.scipedia.com/wd/images/9/98/Draft_Garcia_793853339-223-8739-document.pdf">Draft_Garcia_793853339-223-8739-document.pdf</a> directly to your device.
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2016

Volume 4, Issue 1, 2016
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?