Abstract

Roundabouts show great advantages due to their geometry and their priority system, both in terms of capacity and road safety, compared to other intersections. However, unbalanced flows may be a problem even at medium demand levels. One single approach may cause queues on the downstream approaches as drivers are not allowed to entry the roundabout. If that downstream approach has the highest flow demand, average delay is highly increased; so, the roundabout can be collapsed. This operational problem is derived from one of roundabouts fundamental properties: movements with greater traffic demand cannot be prioritized, unlike signalized intersections. A few solutions may be found, but the most cost-effective measure is traffic regulation by metering signals. The aim of the research is to analyze capacity improvements and operational performance on roundabouts with metering signals using traffic microsimulation, for Spain local conditions. Metering signals are based on creating gaps in the circulating stream in order to alleviate excessive delays on the main approach of the roundabout. Consequently, they are used only on heavy demand conditions during peak hours. On the metered approach, which causes problems for a main downstream approach (controlling approach), metering signals are implemented. The metered approach is stopped by red signals controlled by a queue detector on the controlling approach. So, the controlling approach is benefited by metering signals as drivers can easily enter the roundabout; and the roundabout overall traffic operation is improved. The research was conducted in 5 stages: roundabouts selection; field study; calibration and validation of a traffic microsimulation model in VISSIM; generation of multiple scenarios; and, analysis of the results. Two roundabouts with known unbalanced flow patterns on Valencia (Spain) were selected; traffic counts were carried out to describe their traffic flow patterns, which resulted on limited capacity at both locations. In order to quantify traffic operation improvement on metered roundabouts, a traffic microsimulation model in VISSIM was elaborated. The model was calibrated and validated using critical gaps, queues, delays, and speeds. Afterwards, a metering signal technique was implemented on VisVAP, based on an ad hoc signal control logic design. Almost 400 combinations of design and control metering signals parameters were required to obtain the optimal model (distances to yield line, red and green time settings) which presented the lowest average delay. It could be concluded that, for the same medium-high circulating flow, a higher demand would be able to enter the roundabout (of up to 80% from the controlled approach) with less average delay values (22% and 56% at each studied roundabout) by installing metering signals.

Keywords

metering signal ; roundabout ; capacity ; delay ; traffic microsimulation

References

  1. Akçelik, 2004 Akçelik, R., 2004. Roundabouts with Unbalanced Flow Patterns, in: ITE Annual Meeting and Exhibit. Lake Buena Vista FL (US).
  2. Akçelik, 2005 Akçelik, R., 2005. Capacity and Performance Analysis of Roundabout Metering Signals, in: Transportation Research Board Roundabout Conference. Vail (US).
  3. Akçelik, 2008 Akçelik, R., 2008. An investigation of the performance of roundabouts with metering signals, in: Transportation Research Board Roundabout Conference. Kansas City (US).
  4. Akçelik, 2011 Akçelik, R., 2011. Roundabout Metering Signals: Capacity, Performance and Timing, in: 6th International Symposium on Highway Capacity and Quality of Service. Stockholm, SE.
  5. Andjic, 2013 Andjic, Z., 2013. Analysis of Innovative Roundabouts Treatments in WA, in: AITPM National Traffic and Transport Conference. Perth (AU).
  6. Federal Highway Administration, 2000 Federal Highway Administration, 2000. Roundabouts: an informational guide.
  7. Gallelli and Vaiana, 2008 Gallelli, V., Vaiana, R., 2008. Roundabout Intersections: Evaluation of Geometric and Behavioural Features with VISSIM, in: Transportation Research Board Roundabout Conference. Kansas City (US).
  8. Hummer et al., 2014 J. Hummer, J. Milazzo, B. Schroeder, K. Salamati; Potential for Metering to Help Roundabouts Manage Peak Period Demands in the United States; Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2402 (2014), pp. 56–66 http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2402-07
  9. Martin-Gasulla et al., 2016 Martin-Gasulla, M., Garcia, A., Moreno, A.T., 2016. Benefit Measurement of Metering Signals at Roundabouts with Unbalanced-Flow Patterns in Spain, in: 95th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting. Washington DC (US).
  10. Munoz and Horowitz, 2003 L. Munoz, R. Horowitz; Highway traffic state estimation using improved mixture kalman filters for effective ramp metering control; 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475), 6 (2003), pp. 6333–6338 2003.1272322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CDC. 2003.1272322
  11. Natalizio, 2005 Natalizio, E., 2005. Roundabouts with Metering Signals, in: ITE Annual Meeting and Exhibit. Meolbourne (AU).
  12. Polus and Vlahos, 2005 Polus, A., Vlahos, E., 2005. Evaluation of Roundabouts versus Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections in Delaware. Project Report DCT 179.
  13. PTV, 2011 PTV, 2011. User Manual. VISSIM 5.3.
  14. Raff, 1950 Raff, M., 1950. A volume warrant for urban stop signs. Eno Foundation for Highway Traffic Control.
  15. Rodegerdts et al., 2010 Rodegerdts, L., Bansen, J., Tiesler, C., Knudsen, J., Myers, E., Johnson, M., Moule, M., Persaud, B., Lyon, C., Hallmark, S., Isebrands, H., Crown, R.B., Guichet, B., O’Brien, A., 2010. An Informational Guide. NCHRP Report 672.
  16. Rodegerdts et al., 2007 Rodegerdts et al., Rodegerdts, L., Blogg, M., Wemple, E., Myers, E., Kyte, M., Dixon, M., List, G., Flannery, A.,. Troutbeck, R.J., Brilon, W., Wu, N., Persaud, B., Lyon, C., Harkey, D., Carter, D., 2007. Roundabouts in the United States. NCHRP Report 572.
  17. Romana, 2011 Romana, M., 2011. Roundabout practice and research in Spain, in: 6th International Symposium on Highway Capacity and Level of Service. Workshop on Roundabouts. Stockholm, SE.
  18. Transportation Research Board, 2010 Transportation Research Board, 2010. Highway Capacity Manual.
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 05/04/17

Licence: Other

Document Score

0

Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?