Autonomous and Connected Cars: HCM Estimates for Freeways with Various Market Penetration Rates

Abstract

Major IT companies and vehicle manufacturers have announced their plans for autonomous driving technology. Autonomous light duty vehicles are often referred to as “driverless cars” (DLC). These technologies intend to partly or fully replace driving by combining navigation systems, artificial intelligence, in-vehicle sensors, roadside ITS and traffic monitoring data, vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communications. The absence of perception errors and the minimal perception and reaction time of DLC enable them to maintain shorter headways, to apply consistent acceleration and deceleration rates, and to optimize the use of gaps. In theory, freeway operations and level of service (LOS) can be impacted to a substantial but yet unknown degree by the DLC. The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM).is a static and macroscopic methodology for assessing various traffic flow facilities. Its 2010 edition is not adjusted for the presence of DLC on highways, however, several of its parameters are sensitive to differences in perception and reaction times, headways, etc. An investigation was conducted to assess the likely changes to traffic flow characteristics that may result from the introduction of DLC. The focus of this paper is on expressways, that is, on HCM analyses of basic freeway segment and freeway weaving segment. DLC is able to increase capacity (c), the maximum service flow rate (MSFi), the adjustment factor for unfamiliar driver population (fP), passenger-car equivalent (PCE), and the proportion of heavy vehicles (PT). The combined benefits improve LOS. The results from the case studies show that the impacts of DLC on HCM parameters are tiny if the DLC have a very small market share. Two types of DLC are considered in this paper: Autonomous DLC, and Connected DLC with V2V and V2I. On a basic freeway segment the Autonomous DLC improves LOS from D to C when its share in traffic reaches 7%. The same case study shows that the Connected DLC improves LOS from D to C when its share in traffic reaches 3%.

Keywords

HCM ; Freeway ; Capacity ; Driverless Car ; Autonomous Vehicle ; Connected Vehicle

References

1. Arem, 2015 Arem, Bart van. “Automated Vehicle Symposium 2015.” 7 2015. http://static.googleusercontent.com/media/www.google.com/en//selfdrivingcar/files/reports/report-0815.pdf.
2. Barth, 2012 Barth, Matthew. Road Vehicles Automation Workshop. July 24-26, 2012.
3. Baskar, 2009 L.D. Baskar; B De Schutter, and J Hellendoorn. “Optimal Routing for Intelligent Vehicle Highway Systems Using a Macroscopic Traffic Flow Model.”; IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. (2009), pp. 576–581
4. Benekohal and Rahim, 1995 Benekohal, Rahim F, and Weixiong Zhao. “Effects of Heavy Vehicles on Intersection Delay and Passenger Car Equivalents.“Institue of Transportation Engineers , 1995.
5. Carbaugh et al., 1998 Carbaugh, Jason, N. Godbole Datta, Raja Sengupta; “Safety and Capacity Analysis of Automated and Manual Highway Systems.”; Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technologies (1998), pp. 69–99
6. HCM, 2010 HCM. Highway Capacity Manual. Washington D. C: The National Academies, 2010.
7. Kesting et al., 2005 Kesting, Arne, Martin Treiber; Martin Schonhof, and Florian Kranke; “Jam-Avoiding Adaptive Cruise Control and Its Impact on Traffic Dynamics.” Traffic and Granular Flow (2005) 663- 643
8. Kusuma and Andyka, 2013 Kusuma, Andyka, Ronghui Liu, and Montgomery Francis. “Gap Acceptance Behavior in Motorway Weaving Sections.” Proceedings of the Easter Asia Society for Transportation Studies. 2013.
9. Nass, 0847 Nass, Clifford. “Road Vehicles Automation Workshop.” July 2013. http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/depssite/documents/webpage/deps_084771.pdf.
10. Ni et al., 2010 Ni, Daiheng, Jia Li, S Andrews, and Haizhong Wang. “Preliminary Estimate of Highway Capacity Benefit Attainable with IntelliDrive Technologies.” IEEE Conference on ITS. 2010. 819-824.
11. Parasuraman et al., 2000 Parasuraman, Raja, B. Thomas, Sheridan, D. Christopher; Wickens. “A Model for Types and Levels of Human Interaction with Automation.” IEEE Transactions on Systems; Man, and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans (2000), pp. 286–297
12. Shi and Liang, 2014 Shi, Liang, and Panos D Prevedouros. “Is the HCM Ready to Handle Driverless Cars? An Assessment of Uninterrupted Flow Chapters.” 94th Annual Meeting of TRB. 2014. Washington, D.C.